4.8 Article

Why Superhydrophobicity Is Crucial for a Water-Jumping Microrobot? Experimental and Theoretical Investigations

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 4, Issue 7, Pages 3706-3711

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am300794z

Keywords

water jumping microrobot; bioinspired; mechanism; numerical model; superhydrophobicity

Funding

  1. State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System of Harbin Institute of Technology [SKLRS200901C]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50803013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reported for the first time a novel microrobot that could continuously jump on the water surface without sinking, imitating the excellent aquatic locomotive behaviors of a water strider. The robot consisted of three supporting legs and two actuating legs made from superhydrophobic nickel foam and a driving system that included a miniature direct current motor and a reduction gear unit In spite of weighing 11 g, the microrobot jumped 14 cm high and 35 cm long at each leap. In order to better understand the jumping mechanism on the water surface, the variation of forces exerted on the supporting legs was carefully analyzed and calculated based on numerical models and computational simulations. Results demonstrated that superhydrophobicity was crucial for increasing the upward force of the supporting legs and reducing the energy consumption in the process of jumping. Although bionic microrobots mimicking the horizontal skating motions of aquatic insects have been fabricated in the past years, few studies reported a miniature robot capable of continuously jumping on the water surface as agile as a real water strider. Therefore, the present finding not only offers a possibility for vividly imitating and better understanding the amazing water jumping capability of aquatic insects but also extends the application of porous and superhydrophobic materials to advanced robotic systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available