4.8 Article

Processing, Morphology, and Water Uptake of Nafion/Ex situ Stober Silica Nanocomposite Membranes As a Function of Particle Size

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 4, Issue 12, Pages 6765-6772

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am301931e

Keywords

Nafion membrane; silica nanoparticles; water uptake; morphology

Funding

  1. Energy Materials Corporation (EMC)
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Chemistry [840336] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because of the bicontinuous phase structure of Nafion with small hydrophilic channels, formation of composites with silica colloids to improve thermal stability, hydration, and proton conductivity should be influenced by size and surface functionality of the colloids. To test this hypothesis, we prepared batches of silica particles between 20 and 400 nm in diameter with narrow polydispersities using a modified Stober procedure. Some particles were subsequently surface-modified using mercaptopropyltriethoxysilane. Enough particles were mixed with Nafion in alcohols to achieve 5 wt % silica in the final membranes, which were made by casting and drying. Membrane top and bottom surface and cross-section morphologies were examined with AFM and SEM to determine how the particles were dispersed. We discovered that casting the membranes from dispersions with viscosities less than 65 cPs led to larger particles floating to the top surface of the membrane where they were easily dislodged from the dry membrane. Membranes cast from more viscous solutions exhibited homogeneous distributions of particles. Water uptake was over 60% higher in nanocomposites with unmodified silica particles than for Nafion and about 15% higher than for Nafion with in situ generated silica particles, but showed no trend in water uptake correlating with particle size. Surface silated particles of all sizes appeared to have reduced water uptake relative to Nafion alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available