4.8 Article

Electronic and Magnetic Properties and Structural Stability of BeO Sheet and Nanoribbons

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages 4787-4795

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am201271j

Keywords

BeO; sheet; nanoribbons; electronic structure; magnetism; stability

Funding

  1. 973 Program [2007CB936204, 2012CB933403]
  2. National NSF [11172124, 10732040, 91023026]
  3. Jiangsu Province NSF of China [BK2008042, BK2011722]
  4. NUAA [4015-YAH10043]
  5. National and Jiangsu Postdoctoral Research Foundation [20110490132, 1002015B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The novel electronic and magnetic properties of BeO nanoribbons (BeO NRs) as well as their stability are investigated through extensive density functional theory calculations. Different from semiconducting graphene nanoribbons and insulating BN ribbons, all zigzag edged BeO NRs are revealed to display ferromagnetic and metallic natures independent of the ribbon width and edge passivation. The polarized electron spins in H-passivated zigzag BeO NRs are from the unpaired electrons around the weakly formed Be H bonds, while those of bare zigzag BeO NRs are due to the 2p states of edge O atoms. In sharp contrast, all armchair BeO NRs are nonmagnetic insulators regardless of the edge passivation. In particular, all bare armchair BeO NRs have a nearly constant band gap due to a peculiar edge localization effect. Interestingly, the band gaps of all armchair BeO NRs can be markedly reduced by an applied transverse electric field and even completely closed at a critical field. The critical electric field required for gap closing decreases with increasing ribbon width, thus the results have practical importance. Further stability analysis shows that bare BeO NRs are more stable than H-passivated BeO NRs of similar ribbon widths and bare armchair BeO NRs are energetically the most favorable among all the nanoribbons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available