4.8 Article

Hierarchical Titania Nanotubes with Self-Branched Crystalline Nanorods

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages 1581-1587

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am100299e

Keywords

titania nanotubes; self-branching; Li secondary battery electrode; layered titanate

Funding

  1. NRL Programs [ROA-2007-000-20105-0]
  2. Nano RD Program [M10503000255-05M0300-25510, 2005-02522, 2009-0082717]
  3. Priority Research Centers Program [2009-0093814]
  4. MEST [2009-0086302]
  5. MEST/KOSEF [R11-2005-048-00000-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface decoration strategy for one-dimensional nanostructures will improve their electrical, optical, mechanical, and electrochemical performances dramatically. Heterogeneous growth/deposition on surfaces, however, may create undesired junction interfaces in the system. Here we report a procedure during which amorphous titania nanotubes are readily self-branched with crystalline titanate nanorods at room temperature. The starting amorphous titania nanotubes were prepared by low-temperature atomic layer deposition combined with the template-directed approach. We routinely observed the self-branching phenomenon of crystalline titanate nanorods with a few nanometers in diameter onto the surfaces of the amorphous titania nanotubes in mild alkali solutions. The resulting structures were analyzed by field-emission scanning electron microscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, and electron energy loss spectroscopy. The reactivity of the hierarchical titania nanotube arrays was observed to be improved as a Li secondary battery electrode. Upon complete consumption of the amorphous body of titania nanotubes, in addition, titanate nanosheets/layers consisting of single TiO2 layers with unit-cell thickness were obtained, elucidating the formation mechanism of layered titanate materials by alkali treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available