4.5 Article

Radio Link Quality Estimation in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey

Journal

ACM TRANSACTIONS ON SENSOR NETWORKS
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/2240116.2240123

Keywords

Experimentation; Measurement; Performance; Design; Link quality estimation; low-power links; wireless sensor networks; link characteristics

Funding

  1. ReDCAD Research Unit [05-UR-1403]
  2. Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research
  3. CISTER Research Unit [608FCT]
  4. FEDER funds through COMPETE (POFC-Operational Programme Thematic Factors of Competitiveness)
  5. National Funds (PT), through the FCT-Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology
  6. CONET-Cooperating Objects Network of Excellence
  7. European Commission [FP7-ICT-224053]
  8. EMMON project
  9. FCT [EMMON - ARTEMIS/0003/2008]
  10. ARTEMIS [100036]
  11. MASQOTS project [FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-014922]
  12. FEDER funds through COMPETE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Radio link quality estimation in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) has a fundamental impact on the network performance and also affects the design of higher-layer protocols. Therefore, for about a decade, it has been attracting a vast array of research works. Reported works on link quality estimation are typically based on different assumptions, consider different scenarios, and provide radically different (and sometimes contradictory) results. This article provides a comprehensive survey on related literature, covering the characteristics of low-power links, the fundamental concepts of link quality estimation in WSNs, a taxonomy of existing link quality estimators, and their performance analysis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first survey tackling in detail link quality estimation in WSNs. We believe our efforts will serve as a reference to orient researchers and system designers in this area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available