4.5 Article

BikeNet: A Mobile Sensing System for Cyclist Experience Mapping

Journal

ACM TRANSACTIONS ON SENSOR NETWORKS
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/1653760.1653766

Keywords

Design; Experimentation; Performance; Applications; bicycling; recreation; systems

Funding

  1. Intel Corp
  2. Nokia
  3. NSF [NCS-0631289, ARO W911NF-04-1-031]
  4. Institute for Security Technology Studies (ISTS) at Dartmouth College
  5. U.S. Department of Commerce [60NANB6D6130]
  6. U.S. Bureau of Justice Assistance [2005-DD-BX-1091]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present BikeNet, a mobile sensing system for mapping the cyclist experience. Built leveraging the MetroSense architecture to provide insight into the real-world challenges of people-centric sensing, BikeNet uses a number of sensors embedded into a cyclist's bicycle to gather quantitative data about the cyclist's rides. BikeNet uses a dual-mode operation for data collection, using opportunistically encountered wireless access points in a delay-tolerant fashion by default, and leveraging the cellular data channel of the cyclist's mobile phone for real-time communication as required. BikeNet also provides a Web-based portal for each cyclist to access various representations of her data, and to allow for the sharing of cycling-related data (for example, favorite cycling routes) within cycling interest groups, and data of more general interest (for example, pollution data) with the broader community. We present: a description and prototype implementation of the system architecture based on customized Moteiv Tmote Invent motes and sensor-enabled Nokia N80 mobile phones; an evaluation of sensing and inference that quantifies cyclist performance and the cyclist environment; a report on networking performance in an environment characterized by bicycle mobility and human unpredictability; and a description of BikeNet system user interfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available