4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Projective Analysis for 3D Shape Segmentation

Journal

ACM TRANSACTIONS ON GRAPHICS
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/2508363.2508393

Keywords

Projective shape analysis; semantic segmentation and labeling; bilateral symmetric; Hausdorff distance; shape matching

Funding

  1. NSFC [61202222, 61232011, 61025012, 61202223]
  2. 863 Program [2013AA01A604]
  3. Guangdong Science and Technology Program [2011B050200007]
  4. Shenzhen Science and Innovation Program [CXB201104220029A, ZD201111080115A, KC2012JSJS0019A]
  5. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada [293127, 611370]
  6. Israel Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We introduce projective analysis for semantic segmentation and labeling of 3D shapes. The analysis treats an input 3D shape as a collection of 2D projections, labels each projection by transferring knowledge from existing labeled images, and back-projects and fuses the labelings on the 3D shape. The image-space analysis involves matching projected binary images of 3D objects based on a novel bi-class Hausdorff distance. The distance is topology-aware by accounting for internal holes in the 2D figures and it is applied to piecewise-linearly warped object projections to compensate for part scaling and view discrepancies. Projective analysis simplifies the processing task by working in a lower-dimensional space, circumvents the requirement of having complete and well-modeled 3D shapes, and addresses the data challenge for 3D shape analysis by leveraging the massive available image data. A large and dense labeled set ensures that the labeling of a given projected image can be inferred from closely matched labeled images. We demonstrate semantic labeling of imperfect (e. g., incomplete or self-intersecting) 3D models which would be otherwise difficult to analyze without taking the projective analysis approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available