4.0 Article

A preposterior analysis to predict identifiability in the experimental calibration of computer models

Journal

IIE TRANSACTIONS
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 75-88

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/0740817X.2015.1064554

Keywords

Gaussian process models; Kriging; Bayesian calibration; computer experiments

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1233403, CMMI-0928320, CMMI-0758557]
  2. U.S. Army Tank-Automotive Research Development & Engineering Center (TARDEC) [W911NF11D0001-0037]
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1233403] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When using physical experimental data to adjust, or calibrate, computer simulation models, two general sources of uncertainty that must be accounted for are calibration parameter uncertainty and model discrepancy. This is complicated by the well-known fact that systems to be calibrated are often subject to identifiability problems, in the sense that it is difficult to precisely estimate the parameters and to distinguish between the effects of parameter uncertainty and model discrepancy. We develop a form of preposterior analysis that can be used, prior to conducting physical experiments but after conducting the computer simulations, to predict the degree of identifiability that will result after conducting the physical experiments for a given experimental design. Specifically, we calculate the preposterior covariance matrix of the calibration parameters and demonstrate that, in the examples that we consider, it provides a reasonable prediction of the actual posterior covariance that is calculated after the experimental data are collected. Consequently, the preposterior covariance can be used as a criterion for designing physical experiments to help achieve better identifiability in calibration problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available