Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Editors' Malpractice: Forward Submitted Letters (To the Concerned Authors), then Reject Them
HORACIO RIVERA
Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance (2009)
Revealing the faults in medical journals
Thomas J. Liesegang
ARCHIVUM IMMUNOLOGIAE ET THERAPIAE EXPERIMENTALIS (2009)
Peer review: Heart and soul of scientific publication
Anil K. Jain
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS (2009)
Improving the peer-review process for grant applications - Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability
Herbert W. Marsh et al.
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST (2008)
Consistency and inconsistency in PhD thesis examination
Allyson Holbrook et al.
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION (2008)
Most published research findings are false- but a little replication goes a long way
Ramal Moonesinghe et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2007)
An incentive solution to the peer review problem
Marc Hauser et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2007)
A new reader trial approach to peer review in funding research grants: An Australian experiment
Upali W. Jayasinghe et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2006)
Local literature bias in genetic epidemiology: An empirical evaluation of the Chinese literature
ZL Pan et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2005)
Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem
P Bacchetti
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2002)
Peer review in the funding of research in higher education: The Australian experience
UW Jayasinghe et al.
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS (2001)
When reviews attack: Ethics, free speech, and the peer review process
T Hadjistavropoulos et al.
CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGY-PSYCHOLOGIE CANADIENNE (2000)
Share Paper
