4.3 Article

To Tell or Not to Tell? The Ethical Dilemma of the Would-Be Whistleblower

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/08989621003791929

Keywords

ethical decision-making; misconduct; reporting; whistleblowing

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the growing emphasis placed on the responsible conduct of research, little attention has been devoted to the question of what an individual should do upon discovering research misconduct. This article takes seriously the dilemma of a would-be whistle-blower. It identifies ethical considerations that can be taken into account in moral decision-making about reporting research misconduct. It also offers rough guidelines about the moral significance of each consideration in the decision-making process based on the facts of the case in question. The article, therefore, offers tools for a would-be whistle-blower to use to arrive at a defensible resolution to a difficult dilemma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available