4.6 Article

Hemodynamic Effects of Furosemide on Renal Perfusion as Evaluated by ASL-MRI

Journal

ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages 1194-1200

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.04.021

Keywords

Arterial spin labeling; furosemide; renal blood flow; autoregulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale and Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term effects of furosemide on renal perfusion by using arterial spin labeling (ASL) magnetic resonance imaging. Materials and Methods: Eleven healthy human subjects were enrolled in the study. The measurement of renal blood flow (RBF) was performed by applying an ASL technique with flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery spin preparation and a single-shot fast spin-echo imaging strategy on a 3.0-T magnetic resonance scanner. For all subjects, the ASL magnetic resonance images were obtained before agent injection as a baseline scan. Then 20 mg of furosemide was injected intravenously. Postfurosemide ASL images were acquired following administration to evaluate the renal hemodynamic response. Results: Postinjection scans showed that cortical RBF decreased from 366.59 +/- 41.19 mL/100 g/min at baseline to 314.33 +/- 48.83 mL/100 g/min at 10 minutes after the administration of furosemide (paired t test, P = .04 vs baseline), and medullary RBF decreased from 118.59 +/- 24.69 mL/100 g/min at baseline to 97.38 +/- 18.40 mL/100 g/min at 10 minutes after the administration of furosemide (paired t test, P = .01 vs baseline). There was a negative correlation between the furosemide-induced diuretic effect and the reduction of RBF (Spearman's r = -0.61). Conclusions: The dominant hemodynamic effect of furosemide on the kidney is associated with a decrease in both cortical and medullary blood perfusion. Furthermore, the quantitative ASL technique may provide an alternative way to noninvasively monitor the change in renal function due to furosemide administration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available