4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Prospective Multicenter Bronchiolitis Study: Predicting Intensive Care Unit Admissions

Journal

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages 887-894

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00245.x

Keywords

bronchiolitis; risk factors; multivariate predictors; ICU admission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The authors sought to identify predictors of intensive care unit (ICU) admission among children hospitalized with bronchiolitis for 24 hours. Methods: The authors conducted a prospective cohort study during two consecutive bronchiolitis seasons, 2004 through 2006, in 30 U.S. emergency departments (EDs). All included patients were aged <2 years and had a final diagnosis of bronchiolitis. Regular floor versus ICU admissions were compared. Results: Of 1,456 enrolled patients, 533 (37%) were admitted to the regular floor and 50 (3%) to the ICU. Comparing floor and ICU admissions, multivariate ED predictors of ICU admission were age <2 months (26% vs. 53%; odds ratio [OR] = 4.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.1 to 8.3), an ED visit the past week (25% vs. 40%; OR = 2.2; 95% CI = 1.1 to 4.4), moderate/severe retractions (31% vs. 48%; OR = 2.6; 95%, CI = 1.3 to 5.2), and inadequate oral intake (31% vs. 53%; OR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.6 to 7.1). Unlike previous studies, no association with male gender, socioeconomic factors, insurance status, breast-feeding, or parental asthma was found with ICU admission. Conclusions: In this prospective multicenter ED-based study of children admitted for bronchiolitis, four independent predictors of ICU admission were identified. The authors did not confirm many putative risk factors, but cannot rule out modest associations. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2008; 15:887-894 (C) 2008 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available