4.2 Review

Cognitive decline in the elderly: Is anaesthesia implicated?

Journal

BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 379-393

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2011.05.001

Keywords

postoperative cognitive dysfunction; cognition; Alzheimer's disease; anaesthesia; surgery

Categories

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council Australia [140510, 454440, 454622]
  2. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists -Academic Enhancement Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) was originally thought to be associated with cardiac surgery, but has since been associated with non-cardiac surgery and even sedation for non-invasive procedures such as coronary angiography. The focus of POCD has thus shifted from the type of surgery or anaesthetic to patient susceptibility. The realisation that cognitive impairment, such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI - the prodrome for Alzheimer's disease (AD)), may already exist in many elderly patients who incidentally present for surgery beckons anaesthesia to align cognitive research with that of AD in order to draw valid parallels between the two disciplines. Long-term studies are required to understand if POCD is merely a transient phenomenon, or if it is the harbinger of long-term cognitive deterioration which may lead eventually to dementia. In this regard, the use of CSF analysis to diagnose AD many years before symptoms appear may identify susceptible individuals. Furthermore, animal studies indicate that volatile anaesthestics may augment the pathological processes of AD by affecting amyloid-beta processing. Identification of a link between surgery/anaesthesia, POCD, MCI, and AD would create a unique opportunity to fast-track the development of clinical or pharmacological preventive strategies that would benefit a significant proportion of the population. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available