4.7 Review

Population biology of Gram-positive pathogens: high-risk clones for dissemination of antibiotic resistance

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 872-900

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00284.x

Keywords

Enterococcus; Streptococcus; Staphylococcus; MLST; evolution; molecular epidemiology

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. European Commission [LSHE-CT-2007-037410]
  3. National Institutes of Health [AI-061454, GM-60793, GM088558-01]
  4. FP7 [223031[TROCAR]]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infections caused by multiresistant Gram-positive bacteria represent a major health burden in the community as well as in hospitalized patients. Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium are well-known pathogens of hospitalized patients, frequently linked with resistance against multiple antibiotics, compromising effective therapy. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes are important pathogens in the community and S. aureus has recently emerged as an important community-acquired pathogen. Population genetic studies reveal that recombination prevails as a driving force of genetic diversity in E. faecium, E. faecalis, S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes, and thus, these species are weakly clonal. Although recombination has a relatively modest role driving the genetic variation of the core genome of S. aureus, the horizontal acquisition of resistance and virulence genes plays a key role in the emergence of new clinically relevant clones in this species. In this review, we discuss the population genetics of E. faecium, E. faecalis, S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes and S. aureus. Knowledge of the population structure of these pathogens is not only highly relevant for (molecular) epidemiological research but also for identifying the genetic variation that underlies changes in clinical behaviour, to improve our understanding of the pathogenic behaviour of particular clones and to identify novel targets for vaccines or immunotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available