4.1 Article

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: what the radiologist needs to know about biphenotypic liver carcinoma

Journal

ABDOMINAL IMAGING
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 310-322

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-013-0069-6

Keywords

Liver MRI; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Cholangiocarcinoma; Biphenotypic liver carcinoma; Liver transplantation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (CHC), also referred to as primary liver carcinoma (PLC) with biphenotypic differentiation, is an increasingly recognized subtype of malignant PLC encompassing varying morphologic forms thought to arise either from progenitor cell lineage or dedifferentiation of mature liver cells. Tumor cells express both biliary and hepatocellular markers by immunohistochemistry, and may also express progenitor cell and stem cell markers. Due to the relative rarity of this tumor type, little is known about the risk factors, imaging appearance, or prognosis. Few studies have demonstrated risk factors that overlap with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC), though not all appear to arise in the background of cirrhosis. The imaging appearances of these tumors may overlap with those of HCC and CC and discriminating features such as classic enhancement patterns and biliary ductal dilation are not universally present. Serum tumor markers, such as alpha-fetoprotein and carbohydrate antigen 19-9, may be helpful when they are discordant with imaging or if both are elevated to a significant degree. In regards to management and prognosis, most studies demonstrate worse outcomes compared with HCC or CC. In the United States, the diagnosis of HCC is frequently made with imaging alone, and subsequent management decisions, including organ allocation for transplantation, rely upon the radiological diagnosis. Given the importance of radiological diagnosis, awareness of this tumor type is essential for appropriate management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available