4.1 Article

FDG PET/CT in the liver: lesions mimicking malignancies

Journal

ABDOMINAL IMAGING
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 187-195

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-013-0043-3

Keywords

FDG; PET/CT; Liver; Tumour; Metastases; Abscess

Ask authors/readers for more resources

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT is invaluable in managing liver lesions, in particular in the evaluation of suspected liver metastases. It is both sensitive and specific in detecting liver metastases from a wide range of primary cancers, and may change clinical management, most commonly by detecting additional lesions and decreasing the number of futile surgeries. However, some benign lesions may also show increased metabolic activity which can lead to false positive PET findings. We describe some of these lesions and their imaging characteristics that may help in differentiating them from malignant metastases. We reviewed all whole body FDG PET/CT studies performed over a 5-year period in our institution, and identified those with focal liver lesions showing increased FDG uptake for which histological results were available. A majority of lesions showing increased metabolic activity were due to malignant disease, such as metastases or primary liver tumours. However, we also found increased FDG uptake in non-neoplastic lesions such as Cryptococcosis, abscesses, and secondary inflammation from cholecystitis. Increased metabolic activity was also seen in some benign neoplasms such as hepatic adenomas and hemangioendotheliomas. FDG PET/CT is currently the most sensitive non-invasive imaging modality for the detection of hepatic metastases, particularly from the gastrointestinal tract. False positive results are rare, and have been described mainly in abscesses. However, other lesions can also show increased metabolic activity, and failure to differentiate these from metastases may result in inappropriate treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available