3.8 Proceedings Paper

Automatic Skull-stripping of Rat MRI/DTI Scans and Atlas Building

Journal

MEDICAL IMAGING 2011: IMAGE PROCESSING
Volume 7962, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPIE-INT SOC OPTICAL ENGINEERING
DOI: 10.1117/12.878405

Keywords

MRI; DTI; small animal imaging; rat; segmentation; atlas building; alcohol; cocaine

Funding

  1. NADIA [U01-AA020022]
  2. NIH [IP01DA022446-02, RC1AA019211, R41 NS059095, AA06059, AA019969]
  3. UNC Neurodevelopmental Disorders Research Center HD [03110]
  4. UNC Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

3D Magnetic Resonance (MR) and Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) have become important noninvasive tools for the study of animal models of brain development and neuropathologies. Fully automated analysis methods adapted to rodent scale for these images will allow high-throughput studies. A fundamental first step for most quantitative analysis algorithms is skull-stripping, which refers to the segmentation of the image into two tissue categories, brain and non-brain. In this manuscript, we present a fully automatic skull-stripping algorithm in an atlas-based manner. We also demonstrate how to either modify an external atlas or to build an atlas from the population itself to present a self-contained approach. We applied our method to three datasets of rat brain scans, at different ages (PND5, PND14 and adult), different study groups (control, ethanol exposed, intrauterine cocaine exposed), as well as different image acquisition parameters. We validated our method by comparing the automated skull-strip results to manual delineations performed by our expert, which showed a discrepancy of less than a single voxel on average. We thus demonstrate that our algorithm can robustly and accurately perform the skull-stripping within one voxel of the manual delineation, and in a fraction of the time it takes a human expert.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available