4.5 Article

Natural fracture characterization in tight gas sandstones: Integrating mechanics and diagenesis

Journal

AAPG BULLETIN
Volume 93, Issue 11, Pages 1535-1549

Publisher

AMER ASSOC PETROLEUM GEOLOGIST
DOI: 10.1306/08110909100

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-03ER15430]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-03ER15430] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate predictions of natural fracture flow attributes in sand-stones require an understanding of the underlying mechanisms responsible for fracture growth and aperture preservation. Poroelastic stress calculations combined with fracture mechanics criteria show that it is possible to sustain opening-mode fracture growth with sublithostatic pore pressure without associated or preemptive shear failure. Crack-seal textures and fracture aperture to length ratios suggest that preserved fracture apertures reflect the loading state that caused propagation. This implies that, for quartz-rich sandstones, the synkinematic cement in the fractures and in the rock mass props fracture apertures open and reduces the possibility of aperture loss on unloading and relaxation. Fracture pattern development caused by subcritical fracture growth for a limited range of strain histories is demonstrated to result in widely disparate fracture pattern geometries. Substantial opening-mode growth can be generated by very small extensional strains (on the order of 10(-4)); consequently, fracture arrays are likely to form in the absence of larger scale structures. The effective permeabilities calculated for these low-strain fracture patterns are considerable. To replicate the lower permeabilities that typify tight gas sandstones requires the superimposition of systematic cement filling that preferentially plugs fracture tips and other narrower parts of the fracture pattern.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available