Journal
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 564-580Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2011.04.002
Keywords
Risk aversion; Portfolio choice; Subjective measures; Econometric models; Fixed costs
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The paper investigates risk preferences among different types of individuals. We use several different measures of risk preferences, including questions on choices between uncertain income streams suggested by Barsky, Juster, Kimball, and Shapiro (1997) and a number of ad hoc measures. As in Barsky et al. (1997) and Arrondel and Calvo-Pardo (2002), we first analyze individual variation in the risk aversion measures and explain them by background characteristics (both objective characteristics and other subjective measures of risk preference). Next we incorporate the measured risk preferences into a household portfolio allocation model, which explains portfolio shares, while accounting for incomplete portfolios and fixed costs. Our results show that a measure based on factor analysis of answers to a number of simple risk preference questions has the most explanatory power. The Barsky et al. (1997) measure has less explanatory power than this a-the-oretical measure, suggesting that sophisticated measures based on economic theory may exceed the financial capability of respondents. Fixed costs turn out to provide an economically and statistically highly significant explanation for incomplete portfolios. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available