4.1 Article

Quantitative Live-Cell Confocal Imaging of 3D Spheroids in a High-Throughput Format

Journal

SLAS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 231-242

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2472630318756058

Keywords

HTS; high-throughput screening; data analysis; fabrication

Funding

  1. Unilever
  2. U.S. Department of Education, GAANN Award [P200A150037]
  3. National Science Foundation [OIA1655221]
  4. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Award [1U01ES028184]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurately predicting the human response to new compounds is critical to a wide variety of industries. Standard screening pipelines (including both in vitro and in vivo models) often lack predictive power. Three-dimensional (3D) culture systems of human cells, a more physiologically relevant platform, could provide a high-throughput, automated means to test the efficacy and/or toxicity of novel substances. However, the challenge of obtaining high-magnification, confocal z stacks of 3D spheroids and understanding their respective quantitative limitations must be overcome first. To address this challenge, we developed a method to form spheroids of reproducible size at precise spatial locations across a 96-well plate. Spheroids of variable radii were labeled with four different fluorescent dyes and imaged with a high-throughput confocal microscope. 3D renderings of the spheroid had a complex bowl-like appearance. We systematically analyzed these confocal z stacks to determine the depth of imaging and the effect of spheroid size and dyes on quantitation. Furthermore, we have shown that this loss of fluorescence can be addressed through the use of ratio imaging. Overall, understanding both the limitations of confocal imaging and the tools to correct for these limits is critical for developing accurate quantitative assays using 3D spheroids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available