4.1 Review

Integration of Lead Discovery Tactics and the Evolution of the Lead Discovery Toolbox

Journal

SLAS DISCOVERY
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages 881-897

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2472555218778503

Keywords

high-throughput screening; encoded library technology; virtual screening; integrated lead discovery; phenotypic screening; fragment-based drug discovery; bromo- and extra-terminal domain (BET); receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase I (RIPI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There has been much debate around the success rates of various screening strategies to identify starting points for drug discovery. Although high-throughput target-based and phenotypic screening has been the focus of this debate, techniques such as fragment screening, virtual screening, and DNA-encoded library screening are also increasingly reported as a source of new chemical equity. Here, we provide examples in which integration of more than one screening approach has improved the campaign outcome and discuss how strengths and weaknesses of various methods can be used to build a complementary toolbox of approaches, giving researchers the greatest probability of successfully identifying leads. Among others, we highlight case studies for receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 and the bromo- and extra-terminal domain family of bromodomains. In each example, the unique insight or chemistries individual approaches provided are described, emphasizing the synergy of information obtained from the various tactics employed and the particular question each tactic was employed to answer. We conclude with a short prospective discussing how screening strategies are evolving, what this screening toolbox might look like in the future, how to maximize success through integration of multiple tactics, and scenarios that drive selection of one combination of tactics over another.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available