4.5 Article

Prevent perverse outcomes from global protected area policy

Journal

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages 759-762

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0501-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions [CE11001000104]
  2. Australian Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aichi Target 11 has galvanized expansion of the global protected area network, but there is little evidence that this brings real biodiversity gains. We argue that area-based prioritization risks unintended perverse consequences and that the focus of protected area target development should shift from quantity to quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available