4.6 Article

Needle-shaped ultrathin piezoelectric microsystem for guided tissue targeting via mechanical sensing

Journal

NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 165-172

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41551-018-0201-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Center for Bio-Integrated Electronics
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01HL137193, R01EB24403, R21EB021148, R03CA172738, R01EB019337]
  3. Mayo Clinic
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L016028/1]
  5. China Scholarship Council
  6. Beckman Institute postdoctoral fellowship at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
  7. National Science Foundation [1400169, 1534120, 1635443]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Needles for percutaneous biopsies of tumour tissue can be guided by ultrasound or computed tomography. However, despite best imaging practices and operator experience, high rates of inadequate tissue sampling, especially for small lesions, are common. Here, we introduce a needle-shaped ultrathin piezoelectric microsystem that can be injected or mounted directly onto conventional biopsy needles and used to distinguish abnormal tissue during the capture of biopsy samples, through quantitative real-time measurements of variations in tissue modulus. Using well-characterized synthetic soft materials, explanted tissues and animal models, we establish experimentally and theoretically the fundamental operating principles of the microsystem, as well as key considerations in materials choices and device designs. Through systematic tests on human livers with cancerous lesions, we demonstrate that the piezoelectric microsystem provides quantitative agreement with magnetic resonance elastography, the clinical gold standard for the measurement of tissue modulus. The piezoelectric microsystem provides a foundation for the design of tools for the rapid, modulus-based characterization of tissues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available