4.6 Article

Mechanically induced development and maturation of human intestinal organoids in vivo

Journal

NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages 429-442

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41551-018-0243-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [P30 DK078392]
  2. NIH NIDKK grant [1K99DK110414-02]
  3. Athena Blackburn Research Scholar Award in neuroenteric diseases from American Gastroenterology Association
  4. 'New Team' grant from Bioregate Regenerative Medicine Cluster, University of Nantes
  5. Pays de la Loire Region
  6. NIDDK
  7. NIAID [U01DK103117]
  8. Cincinnati Children's Research Foundation
  9. Cincinnati Biobank
  10. Better Outcomes for Children Biorepository
  11. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [U18EB021780] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  12. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [K99DK110414, U01DK103117, P30DK078392] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The natural ability of stem cells to self-organize into functional tissue has been harnessed for the production of functional human intestinal organoids. Although dynamic mechanical forces play a central role in intestinal development and morphogenesis, conventional methods for the generation of intestinal organoids have relied solely on biological factors. Here, we show that the incorporation of uniaxial strain, using compressed nitinol springs, in human intestinal organoids transplanted into the mesentery of mice induces growth and maturation of the organoids. Assessment of morphometric parameters, transcriptome profiling and functional assays of the strain-exposed tissue revealed higher similarities to native human intestine, with regard to tissue size and complexity, and muscle tone. Our findings suggest that the incorporation of physiologically relevant mechanical cues during the development of human intestinal tissue enhances its maturation and enterogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available