4.4 Article

Extreme magnification of an individual star at redshift 1.5 by a galaxy-cluster lens

Journal

NATURE ASTRONOMY
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 334-342

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41550-018-0430-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA/STScI [14041, 14199, 14208, 14528, 14872, 14922]
  2. NSF [PHY-1607611, AST-1518052, AST-1602595]
  3. MINECO/FEDER, UE [AYA2015-64508-P]
  4. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [CSD2010-00064]
  5. Spanish government MINECO [AYA2015-70815-ERC, AYA2015-63650-P]
  6. JSPS KAKENHI [26800093, 15H05892]
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L00075X/1]
  8. Sloan and Packard Foundation fellowships
  9. PRIN-INAF [1.05.01.94.02]
  10. VILLUM FONDEN Investigator Grant [16599]
  11. [AYA2012-39475-C02-01]
  12. STFC [ST/P000541/1, ST/L00075X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  13. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L00075X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1720756] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  15. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1720756] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  16. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26800093] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Galaxy-cluster gravitational lenses can magnify background galaxies by a total factor of up to similar to 50. Here we report an image of an individual star at redshift z = 1.49 (dubbed MACS J1149 Lensed Star 1) magnified by more than x 2,000. A separate image, detected briefly 0.26 '' from Lensed Star 1, is probably a counterimage of the first star demagnified for multiple years by an object of greater than or similar to 3 solar masses in the cluster. For reasonable assumptions about the lensing system, microlensing fluctuations in the stars' light curves can yield evidence about the mass function of intracluster stars and compact objects, including binary fractions and specific stellar evolution and supernova models. Dark-matter subhaloes or massive compact objects may help to account for the two images' long-term brightness ratio.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available