4.4 Article

Evidence of a plume on Europa from Galileo magnetic and plasma wave signatures

Journal

NATURE ASTRONOMY
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages 459-464

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41550-018-0450-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA through the Jet Propulsion Laboratory [1532308]
  2. NASA through the Applied Physics Laboratory at Johns Hopkins University [143448]
  3. NASA through the University of Texas at Austin [UTA16-001080]
  4. NASA [NNX13AL05G:000002, NNX14AO24G, NNX12AM74G, NNX15AH28G]
  5. NASA [804283, NNX12AM74G, 69713, NNX14AO24G, NNX15AH28G, 675746] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The icy surface of Jupiter's moon, Europa, is thought to lie on top of a global ocean(1-4). Signatures in some Hubble Space Telescope images have been associated with putative water plumes rising above Europa's surface(5,6), providing support for the ocean theory. However, all telescopic detections reported were made at the limit of sensitivity of the data(5-7), thereby calling for a search for plume signatures in in-situ measurements. Here, we report in-situ evidence of a plume on Europa from the magnetic field and plasma wave observations acquired on Galileo's closest encounter with the moon. During this flyby, which dropped below 400 km altitude, the magnetometer(8) recorded an approximately 1,000-kilometre-scale field rotation and a decrease of over 200 nT in field magnitude, and the Plasma Wave Spectrometer(9) registered intense localized wave emissions indicative of a brief but substantial increase in plasma density. We show that the location, duration and variations of the magnetic field and plasma wave measurements are consistent with the interaction of Jupiter's corotating plasma with Europa if a plume with characteristics inferred from Hubble images were erupting from the region of Europa's thermal anomalies. These results provide strong independent evidence of the presence of plumes at Europa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available