4.0 Article

Patient-reported mobility function and engagement in young adults with cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional sample

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHILDRENS ORTHOPAEDICS
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 197-203

Publisher

BRITISH EDITORIAL SOC BONE JOINT SURGERY
DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.12.170127

Keywords

Cerebral palsy; quality of life; life satisfaction; mobility; self-report; adults

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To describe self-reported life satisfaction and motor function of young adults with cerebral palsy (CP). Methods A total of 57 young adults with spastic CP classified as levels I (seven), II (25), III (16), IV (nine) by the Gross Motor Function Classification System, followed from childhood by our CP clinic, returned at a mean age of 27 years two months (SD 3 years 4 months). Self-reported life satisfaction and mobility status were measured by the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Functional Mobility Scale (FMS) and a project questionnaire. Surgical history and childhood mobility were confirmed from medical records. Results The Functional Mobility Scale demonstrated limited but stable mobility function from childhood to adulthood. The PROMIS and PODCI revealed limited motor function compared with a non-disabled normative reference (p < 0.05). Descriptive results showed high dependence on transportation, housing and income; although PROMIS subscales revealed satisfaction with social activities. Self-recall of childhood mobility function using the FMS correlated highly (r = 0.8; p < 0.0001) with historical records. Conclusion Although functional mobility is limited and community independence is not fully achieved in young adults with CP, these participants maintained childhood levels of mobility function into young adulthood, were satisfied with social roles and had minimal reports of pain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available