4.2 Article

Consistency Analysis for Massively Inconsistent Datasets in Bound-to-Bound Data Collaboration

Journal

SIAM-ASA JOURNAL ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 429-456

Publisher

SIAM PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1137/16M1110005

Keywords

uncertainty quantification; bound-to-bound data collaboration; consistency; model validation; inverse problem; computer models

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0002375]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bound-to-bound data collaboration provides a natural framework for addressing both forward and inverse uncertainty quantification problems. In this approach, quantity of interest models are constrained by related experimental observations with interval uncertainty. A collection of such models and observations is termed a dataset and carves out a feasible region in the parameter space. If a dataset has a nonempty feasible set, it is said to be consistent. In real-world applications, it is often the case that collections of models and observations are inconsistent. Revealing the source of this inconsistency, i.e., identifying which models and/or observations are problematic, is essential before a dataset can be used for prediction. To address this issue, we introduce a constraint relaxation- based approach, termed the vector consistency measure, for investigating datasets with numerous sources of inconsistency. The benefits of this vector consistency measure over a previous method of consistency analysis are demonstrated in two realistic gas combustion examples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available