4.4 Article

Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: A Comment

Journal

AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 215-227

Publisher

AMER ECONOMIC ASSOC
DOI: 10.1257/app.3.4.215

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Edward Miguel, Shanker Satyanath, and Ernest Sergenti (2004), henceforth MSS, argue that lower rainfall levels and negative rainfall shocks increase conflict risk in sub-Saharan Africa. This conclusion rests on their finding of a negative correlation between conflict in t and rainfall growth between t - 1 and t - 2. I show that this finding is driven by a (counterintuitive) positive correlation between conflict in t and rainfall levels in t - 2. If lower rainfall levels or negative rainfall shocks increased conflict, MSS's finding should have been due to a negative correlation between conflict in t and rainfall levels in t - 1. In the latest data, conflict is unrelated to rainfall.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available