4.7 Review

An updated overview on the development of new photosensitizers for anticancer photodynamic therapy

Journal

ACTA PHARMACEUTICA SINICA B
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 137-146

Publisher

INST MATERIA MEDICA, CHINESE ACAD MEDICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2017.09.003

Keywords

Anti-cancer; Photosensitizers; Photodynamic therapy; Photochemical reactions; Oncology; BODIPY

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21672082]
  2. Shandong Key Development Project [2016GSF201209]
  3. Young Taishan Scholars Program [tsqn20161037]
  4. Shandong Talents Team Cultivation Plan of University Preponderant Discipline [10027]
  5. Shandong Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars [JQ201721]
  6. FAP/DF [0193.001020/2015]
  7. CNPq [447.628/2014-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Photodynamic therapy (PDT), based on the photoactivation of photosensitizers (PSs), has become a well-studied therapy for cancer. Photofrin, belonging to the first generation of PS, is still widely used for the treatment of different kinds of cancers; however, it has several drawbacks that significantly limit its general clinical use. Consequently, there has been extensive research on the design of PS molecules with optimized pharmaceutical properties, with aiming of overcoming the disadvantages of traditional PS, such as poor chemical purity, long half-life, excessive accumulation into the skin, and low attenuation coefficients. The rational design of novel PS with desirable properties has attracted considerable research in the pharmaceutical field. This review presents an overview on the classical photosensitizers and the most significant recent advances in the development of PS with regard to their potential application in oncology. (C) 2018 Chinese Pharmaceutical Association and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available