4.7 Review

Targeting adenosine for cancer immunotherapy

Journal

JOURNAL FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY OF CANCER
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1186/s40425-018-0360-8

Keywords

Adenosine; A2a receptor; Checkpoint blockade; PD-1; Immunotherapy; CD39; CD73; CTLA-4

Funding

  1. Vaccinex
  2. Celgene
  3. Bristol Meyers Squibb
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Amgen
  6. Syndax
  7. Molecuvax
  8. eTHeRNA
  9. Peregrine
  10. Bayer
  11. Gritstone
  12. MedImmune
  13. Abbvie
  14. Replimune
  15. Genetech/Roche
  16. EMD Serono
  17. Maxcyte
  18. Merck
  19. Aduro
  20. Corvus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immune checkpoint antagonists (CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1) and CAR T-cell therapies generate unparalleled durable responses in several cancers and have firmly established immunotherapy as a new pillar of cancer therapy. To extend the impact of immunotherapy to more patients and a broader range of cancers, targeting additional mechanisms of tumor immune evasion will be critical. Adenosine signaling has emerged as a key metabolic pathway that regulates tumor immunity. Adenosine is an immunosuppressive metabolite produced at high levels within the tumor microenvironment. Hypoxia, high cell turnover, and expression of CD39 and CD73 are important factors in adenosine production. Adenosine signaling through the A2a receptor expressed on immune cells potently dampens immune responses in inflamed tissues. In this article, we will describe the role of adenosine signaling in regulating tumor immunity, highlighting potential therapeutic targets in the pathway. We will also review preclinical data for each target and provide an update of current clinical activity within the field. Together, current data suggest that rational combination immunotherapy strategies that incorporate inhibitors of the hypoxia-CD39-CD73-A2aR pathway have great promise for further improving clinical outcomes in cancer patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available