4.6 Review

Left Ventricular Thrombus After Acute Myocardial Infarction Screening, Prevention, and Treatment

Journal

JAMA CARDIOLOGY
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages 642-649

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1086

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Heart, Blood, and Lung Institute [T32HL007604]
  2. Abbott
  3. Amarin
  4. Amgen
  5. AstraZeneca
  6. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  7. Chiesi
  8. Eisai
  9. Ethicon
  10. Forest Laboratories
  11. Ironwood
  12. Ischemix
  13. Lilly
  14. Medtronic
  15. Pfizer
  16. Roche
  17. Sanofi Aventis
  18. Medicines Company
  19. Hutter Family Professorship in Cardiology
  20. Roche Diagnostics
  21. Siemens
  22. Cleveland Heart Labs
  23. Prevencio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IMPORTANCE Left ventricular (LV) thrombus is a complication of acutemyocardial infarction (MI) and is associated with systemic thromboembolism. With randomized clinical trials investigating the optimal antithrombotic regimen in patients with MI who require concomitant chronic anticoagulation and with the emergence of the direct-acting oral anticoagulants, treatment options for post-MI LV thrombus have become more complicated. Herein, we review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of LV thrombus after acute MI. OBSERVATIONS Contemporary epidemiologic data suggest the incidence of LV thrombus, detected using optimal imaging modalities,may be as high as 15% in patients with ST-segment elevation MI and up to 25% in patients with anterior MI. While a standard transthoracic echocardiogram is commonly used for screening, it is limited by low sensitivity for LV thrombus detection, necessitating the addition of contrast (unless contraindicated) and/or use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging when pretest probability is high. To our knowledge, there are no existing randomized clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation in the prevention or treatment of LV thrombus after MI, and clinicians must rely on available epidemiologic and trial-generated data from related entities to guide treatment. Randomized clinical trials have confirmed that triple therapy increases bleeding rates compared with less potent antithrombotic regimens after MI, and observational data suggest that triple therapy regimens may not prevent LV thrombus formation. On the other hand, if an LV thrombus is detected, anticoagulation is essential to prevent systemic thromboembolism. We offer 1 approach to treatment, grounded in the best available data. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Uncertainties remain regarding the optimal screening pathway, frequency of follow-up imaging, candidate selection for thromboprophylaxis, and treatment strategies for post-MI LV thrombus. Ongoing studies from related therapeutic areas of varying antithrombotic regimens will continue to inform the optimal approach to treatment; however, more dedicated study of this clinical conundrum is also needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available