4.8 Review

Non-fullerene acceptors for organic solar cells

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS MATERIALS
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/natrevmats.2018.3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21734001, 51761165023, 21734009]
  2. US Department of the Navy, Office of Naval Research [N00014-14-1-0580]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB834701, 2014CB643501]
  4. Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Commission [ITC-CNERC14SC01, ITS/083/15]
  5. US Office of Naval Research [N00014-17-1-2201]
  6. Asian Office of Aerospace RD [FA2386-15-1-4106]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Non-fullerene acceptors (NFAs) are currently a major focus of research in the development of bulk-heterojunction organic solar cells (OSCs). In contrast to the widely used fullerene acceptors (FAs), the optical properties and electronic energy levels of NFAs can be readily tuned. NFA-based OSCs can also achieve greater thermal stability and photochemical stability, as well as longer device lifetimes, than their FA-based counterparts. Historically, the performance of NFA OSCs has lagged behind that of fullerene devices. However, recent developments have led to a rapid increase in power conversion efficiencies for NFA OSCs, with values now exceeding 13%, demonstrating the viability of using NFAs to replace FAs in next-generation high-performance OSCs. This Review discusses the important work that has led to this remarkable progress, focusing on the two most promising NFA classes to date: rylene diimide-based materials and materials based on fused aromatic cores with strong electron-accepting end groups. The key structure-property relationships, donor-acceptor matching criteria and aspects of device physics are discussed. Finally, we consider the remaining challenges and promising future directions for the NFA OSCs field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available