4.8 Review

Receptor control in mesenchymal stem cell engineering

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS MATERIALS
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.91

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Medical Research Council [MR/L022710/1]
  2. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P001114/1]
  3. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/N018419/1]
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/N018419/1, BB/L023814/1, BB/P00220X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P001114/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/L022710/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. BBSRC [BB/P00220X/1, BB/L023814/1, BB/N018419/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. EPSRC [EP/P001114/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. MRC [MR/L022710/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Materials science offers a powerful tool to control mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) growth and differentiation into functional phenotypes. A complex interplay between the extracellular matrix and growth factors guides MSC phenotypes in vivo. In this Review, we discuss materials-based bioengineering approaches to direct MSC fate in vitro and in vivo, mimicking cell-matrix-growth factor crosstalk. We first scrutinize MSC-matrix interactions and how the properties of a material can be tailored to support MSC growth and differentiation in vitro, with an emphasis on MSC self-renewal mechanisms. We then highlight important growth factor signalling pathways and investigate various materials-based strategies for growth factor presentation and delivery. Integrin-growth factor crosstalk in the context of MSC engineering is introduced, and bioinspired material designs with the potential to control the MSC niche phenotype are considered. Finally, we summarize important milestones on the road to MSC engineering for regenerative medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available