4.4 Article

Scalewise invariant analysis of the anisotropic Reynolds stress tensor for atmospheric surface layer and canopy sublayer turbulent flows

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.054608

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF-EAR-1344703, NSF-AGS-1644382, NSF-DGE-1068871]
  2. Department of Energy [DE-SC0011461]
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG) as part of the project Climate feedbacks and benefits of semi-arid forests (CliFF) [SCHM 2736/2-1]
  4. Helmholtz-Association through the President's Initiative and Networking Fund as part of the Young Investigator Group Capturing all relevant scales of biosphere-atmosphere exchange-the enigmatic energy balance closure problem [VH-NG-843]
  5. Helmholtz Research School MICMoR Visiting Scientist Fellowship through KIT/IMK-IFU [HGF VH-KO-505]
  6. Directorate For Geosciences
  7. Division Of Earth Sciences [1344703] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0011461] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anisotropy in the turbulent stress tensor, which forms the basis of invariant analysis, is conducted using velocity time series measurements collected in the canopy sublayer (CSL) and the atmospheric surface layer (ASL). The goal is to assess how thermal stratification and surface roughness conditions simultaneously distort the scalewise relaxation towards isotropic state from large to small scales when referenced to homogeneous turbulence. To achieve this goal, conventional invariant analysis is extended to allow scalewise information about relaxation to isotropy in physical (instead of Fourier) space to be incorporated. The proposed analysis shows that the CSL is more isotropic than its ASL counterpart at large, intermediate, and small (or inertial) scales irrespective of the thermal stratification. Moreover, the small (or inertial) scale anisotropy is more prevalent in the ASL when compared to the CSL, a finding that cannot be fully explained by the intensity of the mean velocity gradient acting on all scales. Implications to the validity of scalewise Rotta and Lumley models for return to isotropy as well as advantages to using barycentric instead of anisotropy invariant maps for such scalewise analysis are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available