4.4 Article

Cobalt and Iron Oxides Co-supported on Carbon Nanotubes as an Efficient Bifunctional Catalyst for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Activity in Oxygen Reduction and Oxygen Evolution Reactions

Journal

CHEMISTRYSELECT
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 207-213

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/slct.201702231

Keywords

cobalt oxides; iron oxide; metal-organic frameworks; oxygen evolution reaction; oxygen reduction reaction

Funding

  1. NSF of China [21571062, 21271072, 21503080]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [222201717003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developing efficient non-precious metal electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in energy conversion and storage devices is highly desirable but challenging. This report describes a general approach for preparing cobalt and iron oxide nanoparticles co-supported on nitrogen-doped carbon materials as an efficient oxygen electrode catalyst with an improved catalytic activity toward OER and ORR; these nanoparticles were obtained through pyrolysis of Co- and Fe-based metal-organic frameworks grown directly on the surface of polyvinylimidazole-functionalized carbon nanotubes (CNTs). The Fe/Co-CNTs-800 catalyst pyrolyzed at 800 degrees C exhibited high electrocatalytic activity for ORR, with only approximate to 50mV lesser activity than that of Pt/C at the half-wave potential, and for OER, with only approximate to 70mV lesser activity than that of RuO2 at a current density of 10mAcm(-2) in a 0.1M KOH solution. The potential difference between OER and ORR for Fe/Co-CNTs-800 (EOER-ORR) was 0.905V, which was significantly lower than that for noble-metal catalysts (20wt% Pt/C (1.137V) and RuO2 (1.341V)). The preparation temperature and value of Fe/Co in the catalyst composite are crucial for achieving high electrocatalytic activity for both ORR and OER.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available