4.6 Article

Highly Selective and Rapid Breath Isoprene Sensing Enabled by Activated Alumina Filter

Journal

ACS SENSORS
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 677-+

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00976

Keywords

isoprene; cholesterol; activated alumina; filter; adsorption; breath analysis; SnO2; flame spray pyrolysis

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021_159763/1]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (R'Equip Grant) [206021_170729]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Isoprene is a versatile breath marker for noninvasive monitoring of high blood cholesterol levels as well as for influenza, end stage renal disease, muscle activity, lung cancer, and liver disease with advanced fibrosis. Its selective detection in complex human breath by portable devices (e.g., metal-oxide gas sensors), however, is still challenging. Here, we present a new filter concept based on activated alumina powder enabling fast and highly selective detection of isoprene at the ppb level and high humidity. The filter contains high surface area adsorbents that retain hydrophilic compounds (e.g., ketones, alcohols, ammonia) representing major interferants in breath while hydrophobic isoprene is not affected. As a proof-of-concept, filters of commercial activated alumina powder are combined with highly sensitive but rather nonspecific, nanostructured Pt-doped SnO2 sensors. This results in fast (10 s) measurement of isoprene down to 5 ppb at 90% relative humidity with outstanding selectivity (>100) to breath-relevant acetone, ammonia, ethanol, and methanol, superior to state-of-the-art isoprene sensors. Most importantly, when exposed continuously to simulated breath mixtures (four analytes) for 8 days, this filter-sensor system showed stable performance. It can be incorporated readily into a portable breath isoprene analyzer promising for simple-in-use monitoring of blood cholesterol or other patho/physiological conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available