4.6 Article

Perovskite/Colloidal Quantum Dot Tandem Solar Cells: Theoretical Modeling and Monolithic Structure

Journal

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 869-874

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00207

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cambridge Nehru Bursary
  2. Cambridge Bombay Society Fund
  3. Trinity-Henry Barlow Scholarship
  4. Haidar Scholarship
  5. Rana Denim Pvt. Ltd.
  6. Agency of Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) Singapore
  7. Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/M005143/1, EP/P02484X/1]
  8. St John's College, Cambridge
  9. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M024881/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. EPSRC [EP/M024881/1, EP/M005143/1, EP/P02484X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal-halide perovskite-based tandem solar cells show great promise for overcoming the Shockley-Queisser single-junction efficiency limit via low-cost tandem structures, but so far, they employ conventional bottom-cell materials that require stringent processing conditions. Meanwhile, difficulty in achieving low-bandgap (<1.1 eV) perovskites limits all-perovskite tandem cell development. Here we propose a tandem cell design based on a halide perovskite top cell and a chalcogenide colloidal quantum dot (CQD) bottom cell, where both materials provide bandgap tunability and solution processability. A theoretical efficiency of 43% is calculated for tandem-cell bandgap combinations of 1.55 (perovskite) and 1.0 eV (CQDs) under 1-sun illumination. We highlight that intersubcell radiative coupling contributes significantly (>11% absolute gain) to the ultimate efficiency via photon recycling. We report an initial experimental demonstration of a solution-processed monolithic perovskite/CQD tandem solar cell, showing evidence for subcell voltage addition. We model that a power conversion efficiency of 29.7% is possible by combining state-of-the-art perovskite and CQD solar cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available