4.4 Article

A machine learning-based framework for analyzing car brand styling

Journal

ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1687814018784429

Keywords

Machine learning; styling analysis; car brand styling; styling consistency; classification

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11472073, 11732004, 11701357, 61772104]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT17JC12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To avoid the requirement of expert knowledge in conventional methods for car styling analysis, this article proposes a machine learning-based method which requires no expert-engineered features for car frontal styling analysis. In this article, we aim to identify the group behaviors in car styling such as the degree of brand styling consistency among different automakers and car styling patterns. The brand styling consistency is considered as a group behavior in this article and is formulated as a brand classification problem. This classification problem is then solved by a machine learning method based on the PCANet for automatic feature encoding and the support vector machine for feature-based classification. The brand styling consistency can thus be measured based on the classification accuracy. To perform the analysis, a car frontal styling database with 23 brands is first built. To present discovered brand styling patterns in classification, a decoding method is proposed to map salient features for brand classification to original images for revelation of salient styling regions. To provide a direct perception in brand styling characteristics, frontal styling representatives of several brands are present as well. This study contributes to efficient identification of brand styling consistency and visualization of brand styling patterns without relying on expert experience.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available