4.2 Article

Parameter identification for structural health monitoring based on Monte Carlo method and likelihood estimate

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1550147718786888

Keywords

Parameter identification; damage identification; likelihood estimate; Monte Carlo method; structural health monitoring

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578140, 51478356]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFE0127600]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Grant Support
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) [CE02-2-8]
  5. Postgraduate Research & Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province and Fundamental Research Funds for Southeast University [KYLX15_0084]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Structural parameters are the most important factors reflecting structural performance and conditions. As a result, their identification becomes the most essential aspect of the structural assessment and damage identification for the structural health monitoring. In this article, a structural parameter identification method based on Monte Carlo method and likelihood estimate is proposed. With which, parameters such as stiffness and damping are identified and studied. Identification effects subjected to three different conditions with no noise, with Gaussian noise, and with non-Gaussian noise are studied and compared. Considering the existence of damage, damage identification is also realized by the identification of the structural parameters. Both simulations and experiments are conducted to verify the proposed method. Results show that structural parameters, as well as the damages, can be well identified. Moreover, the proposed method is much robust to the noises. The proposed method may be prospective for the application of real structural health monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available