4.1 Article

Elite hairy roots of Raphanus sativus (L.) as a source of antioxidants and flavonoids

Journal

3 BIOTECH
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13205-018-1153-y

Keywords

Agrobacterium rhizogenes; Acetosyringone; Quercetin; Antioxidant activity; Radish

Funding

  1. University Grant Commission: Basic Scientific Research (UGC-BSR Fellowship), Government of India, New Delhi [F.7-25/2007]
  2. DST-FIST Program [DST-FIST:SR/FST/LSI-618/2014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An efficient protocol for hairy root induction in radish was established by optimizing several parameters that affect the efficiency of Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformations. Explants wounded using sterile hypodermic needle, infected with Agrobacterium suspension (0.6 OD600) for 10 min and co-cultivated in 1/2 MS medium containing acetosyringone (100 mu M) for 2 days displayed maximum percentage of hairy root induction using MTCC 2364 (77.6%) and MTCC 532 (67.6%). On further experiments with MTCC 2364 initiated hairy roots, maximum biomass accumulation (fresh weight = 9.50 g; dry weight = 1.48 g) was achieved in liquid 1/2 MS medium supplemented with 87.6 mM sucrose after 40 days of culture. Transgenic state of hairy roots of MTCC 2364 was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction using rolB- and rolC-specific primers. The MTCC 2364-induced hairy roots produced higher amount of phenolic (33.0 mg g(-1)), flavonoid (48.0 mg g(-1)), and quercetin (114.8 mg g(-1)) content compared to auxin-induced roots of non-transformed radish. Furthermore, the results of ferric reducing antioxidant power and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl assay confirmed that the antioxidant activity of MTCC 2364 root extracts was improved when compared to auxin-induced roots of non-transformed radish. The present study offers a new insight in radish for production of phenolics and flavonoids (quercetin) using A. rhizogenes-mediated hairy root induction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available