4.7 Article

Risk-based pipeline re-assessment optimization considering corrosion defects

Journal

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
Volume 38, Issue -, Pages 746-757

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.021

Keywords

Pipeline; Reliability; Risk-based management; Corrosion; Re-assessment interval; Cost evaluation; Probability of failure

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pipelines are critical assets for transporting different crucial items such as oil, natural gas, and water, and they are critical for a city's reliable, safe and secure operations. Metal loss corrosion is one of the main failure modes that pipelines suffer from that can lead to pipeline rupture or collapse. Inspections or assessments are performed periodically to assess the health conditions of pipelines. Existing methods for determining the optimal inspection interval mainly used constant fixed re-assessment interval as the decision variable during the whole service. However, pipelines with different defect sizes at the current inspection point lead to different future defect growth and failure probability, and it is more reasonable to apply different re-assessment intervals depending on pipeline health conditions. This paper proposes a method to find the optimal re-assessment intervals for pipelines subject to multiple corrosion defects, where the probability of failure (PoF) threshold is used as the decision variable for this optimization problem. Uncertainties from various sources are considered in this study to achieve an accurate and realistic prediction. A simulation-based cost evaluation approach is developed for a given reassessment policy defined by the PoF threshold. First-order reliability method is used to calculate the PoF to improve the efficiency. The optimal PoF threshold can be obtained corresponding to the minimum expected cost rate. An example is given to demonstrate the proposed approach, and sensitivity studies are performed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available