4.7 Article

Sustainability assessment of brick work for low-cost housing: A comparison between waste based bricks and burnt clay bricks

Journal

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
Volume 37, Issue -, Pages 396-406

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.11.025

Keywords

Sustainable construction material; Life cycle assessment; Sustainability index; Multicriteria decision; Low cost housing

Funding

  1. SERB-Department of Science and Technology, India [SB/S3/CE/077/2013]
  2. Indian National Science Academy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Manufacturing of bricks, using clay or fly ash, is one of the major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions as their manufacturing involves utilization of coal and cement. To overcome this limitation, alternative construction materials are developed by author using industrial and agro wastes like cotton mill waste, recycled paper mill waste, and rice husk ash. This work aims at performing a sustainability assessment of burnt clay bricks and bricks made of industrial and agro wastes used for brickwork in a low-cost house. The criteria considered for the assessment are economic, environmental, social, and technical aspects for manufacture of bricks and use of different bricks for brickwork. For the evaluation of environmental criterion, a life cycle assessment (LCA) tool is used. Overall sustainability index (SI) is calculated for alternatives based on the various criteria using MIVES approach. The relative SIs of clay and fly ash bricks, were 0.25 and 0.26, respectively. Overall, bricks made of industrial and agro wastes are found more sustainable with the highest SI for cotton waste bricks (0.94). Sensitivity analysis also confirmed that brickwork from waste based bricks is more sustainable compared to brickwork made from clay brick or fly ash brick.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available