4.5 Article

Ionospheric Variability Due to Tides and Quasi-Two Day Wave Interactions

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages 1554-1565

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017JA025105

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41704153, 41421063, 41304123]
  2. National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ionospheric variabilities due to planetary waves (PWs) are complicated due to their nonlinear interaction with tides (migrating diurnal and semidiurnal tides [DW1 and SW2]) in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere region. The quasi-two day wave (QTDW) is the most dominant oscillation during austral summer period except tides. This paper quantitatively studies the contribution of W3 QTDW, secondary PWs generated by the QTDW-tide interaction, and the change of tides to the ionospheric vertical drift variabilities. It is found that the secondary PWs generated by the QTDW-DW1 interaction (16hr W4 and 48hr E2) contribute more to the ionospheric variability than those generated by the QTDW-SW2 interaction (9.6hr W5 and 16hr E1). The latitudinal distribution of the vertical drift induced by tides and PWs varies due to their different wind structures. The vertical drift induced by DW1 is weakened at all latitudes due to the existence of W3 QTDW, whereas the SW2-induced vertical drift is enhanced at low latitudes and decreased at middle latitudes. The W3 QTDW induces weaker vertical drift in the equatorial region than that induced by 16hr W4, 48hr E2, and the change of tides. At middle latitudes, the vertical drift induced by W3 QTDW is slightly stronger than that induced by 48hr E2 and the change of DW1 but is comparable to that induced by 16hr W4 and the change of SW2. Our simulations show that the changes of tidal amplitudes and secondary PWs are as important as the QTDW itself to the day-to-day ionospheric variabilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available