4.7 Article

Ocean-Forced Ice-Shelf Thinning in a Synchronously Coupled Ice-Ocean Model

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages 864-882

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017JC013251

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. UK Natural Environment Research Council [NE/M003590/1]
  2. NSF [OCE 1737759]
  3. NASA [NNX13AK88G]
  4. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [1603854] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/N01801X/1, bas0100033, NE/M001660/1, NE/R016038/1, bas0100034, NE/M003590/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. NERC [NE/M001660/1, bas0100033, NE/N01801X/1, NE/M003590/1, bas0100034] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The first fully synchronous, coupled ice shelf-ocean model with a fixed grounding line and imposed upstream ice velocity has been developed using the MITgcm (Massachusetts Institute of Technology general circulation model). Unlike previous, asynchronous, approaches to coupled modeling our approach is fully conservative of heat, salt, and mass. Synchronous coupling is achieved by continuously updating the ice-shelf thickness on the ocean time step. By simulating an idealized, warm-water ice shelf we show how raising the pycnocline leads to a reduction in both ice-shelf mass and back stress, and hence buttressing. Coupled runs show the formation of a western boundary channel in the ice-shelf base due to increased melting on the western boundary due to Coriolis enhanced flow. Eastern boundary ice thickening is also observed. This is not the case when using a simple depth-dependent parameterized melt, as the ice shelf has relatively thinner sides and a thicker central bulge for a given ice-shelf mass. Ice-shelf geometry arising from the parameterized melt rate tends to underestimate backstress (and therefore buttressing) for a given ice-shelf mass due to a thinner ice shelf at the boundaries when compared to coupled model simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available