4.7 Article

Arctic Sea Ice Drift Measured by Shipboard Marine Radar

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
Volume 123, Issue 6, Pages 4298-4321

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018JC013769

Keywords

Sea ice; Dynamics; Remote sensing; Ice mechanics; air; sea; ice exchange processes; Instruments and techniques

Categories

Funding

  1. US Office of Naval Research [N00014-13-1-0288, N00014-15-12638]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents Arctic sea ice drift fields measured by shipboard marine X-band radar (MR). The measurements are based on the maximum cross correlation between two sequential MR backscatter images separated approximate to 1 min in time, a method that is commonly used to estimate sea ice drift from satellite products. The advantage of MR is that images in close temporal proximity are readily available. A typical MR antenna rotation period is approximate to 1-2 s, whereas satellite revisit times can be on the order of days. The technique is applied to approximate to 4 weeks of measurements taken from R/V Sikuliaq in the Beaufort Sea in the fall of 2015. The resulting sea ice velocity fields have approximate to 500 m and up to approximate to 5 min resolution, covering a maximum range of approximate to 4 km. The MR velocity fields are validated using the GPS-tracked motion of Surface Wave Instrument Float with Tracking (SWIFT) drifters, wave buoys, and R/V Sikuliaq during ice stations. The comparison between MR and reference sea ice drift measurements yields root-mean-square errors from 0.8 to 5.6 cms(-1). The MR sea ice velocity fields near the ice edge reveal strong horizontal gradients and peak speeds>1 ms(-1). The observed submesoscale sea ice drift processes include an eddy with approximate to 6 km diameter and vorticities <-2 (normalized by the Coriolis frequency) as well as converging and diverging flow with normalized divergences <-2 and >1, respectively. The sea ice drift speed correlates only weakly with the wind speed (r(2)=0.34), which presents a challenge to conventional wisdom.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available