4.7 Article

Coherent Seismic Arrivals in the P Wave Coda of the 2012 Mw7.2 Sumatra Earthquake: Water Reverberations or an Early Aftershock?

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
Volume 123, Issue 4, Pages 3147-3159

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2018JB015573

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
  2. Weston Howland Jr. Postdoctoral Scholarship
  3. National Science Foundation at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC, San Diego [EAR-1620251]
  4. Seismological Facilities for the Advancement of Geoscience and EarthScope (SAGE) Proposal of the National Science Foundation [EAR-1261681]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Teleseismic records of the 2012M(w)7.2 Sumatra earthquake contain prominent phases in the P wave train, arriving about 50 to 100s after the direct P arrival. Azimuthal variations in these arrivals, together with back-projection analysis, led Fan and Shearer (, ) to conclude that they originated from early aftershock(s), located approximate to 150 km northeast of the mainshock and landward of the trench. However, recently, Yue et al. (, ) argued that the anomalous arrivals are more likely water reverberations from the mainshock, based mostly on empirical Green's function analysis of a M6 earthquake near the mainshock and a water phase synthetic test. Here we present detailed back-projection and waveform analyses of three M6 earthquakes within 100km of the M(w)7.2 earthquake, including the empirical Green's function event analyzed in Yue et al. (, ). In addition, we examine the waveforms of three M5.5 reverse-faulting earthquakes close to the inferred early aftershock location in Fan and Shearer (, ). These results suggest that the reverberatory character of the anomalous arrivals in the mainshock coda is consistent with water reverberations, but the origin of this energy is more likely an early aftershock rather than delayed and displaced water reverberations from the mainshock.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available