4.5 Article

Atmospheric and Surface Climate Associated With 1986-2013 Wildfires in North America

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES
Volume 123, Issue 5, Pages 1588-1609

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2017JG004195

Keywords

climate; wildfire; North America

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [BCS-1435744]
  2. Environmental Computing Center of the Oregon State University College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences
  3. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  4. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [1435744, 1437074] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analyze climate simulations conducted with the RegCM3 regional climate model on 50- and 15-km model grids to diagnose the dependence of wildfire incidence and area burned variations on monthly climate long-term means and anomalies over North America for the period 1986-2013. We created a new wildfire database by merging the Fire Program Analysis Fire-Occurrence Database, the National Interagency Fire Center Fire History Data, and the Canadian National Fire Database. The database includes 2,083,865 daily fire starts that burned a total of 1.25x10(8)ha in North America. We derive long-term climatologies, standardized gamma indices, and composite climate anomalies of atmospheric circulation (500-hPa height and wind) and various surface fields (e.g., solar radiation, soil moisture, vapor pressure deficit, and latent and sensible heat fluxes) to illustrate the climatology of burned area. The immediate and lagged monthly atmospheric circulation and surface climate anomalies differentiate high- and low-fire years and the role of El Nino-Southern Oscillation in wildfire occurrence. Our approach demonstrates the association of the seasonal cycles of wildfire and climate and the strong role of climatic variability in modulating the seasonal cycle as a control of wildfire on monthly time scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available