Journal
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES
Volume 123, Issue 4, Pages 1387-1405Publisher
AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017JG004256
Keywords
-
Funding
- National Science Foundation's Division of Emerging Frontiers, EAGER-NEON [1550657, 1550650, 1550639]
- Direct For Biological Sciences
- Emerging Frontiers [1550650, 1560944] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
- Emerging Frontiers
- Direct For Biological Sciences [1550657, 1550639] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Understanding how the physical structure of forest canopies influences light absorption is a long-standing area of inquiry fundamental to the physical sciences, including the modeling and interpretation of biogeochemical cycles. Conventional measures of forest canopy structure used to infer canopy light absorption are often limited to leaf or vegetation area indexes. However, LiDAR-derived measures of canopy structural complexity (CSC) that describe the arrangement of vegetation may improve prediction of canopy light absorption by providing novel information on canopy-light interactions not regulated by leaf area alone. We measured multiple indexes of CSC, vegetation area index (VAI), and the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed (fPAR) across the eastern United States using portable canopy LiDAR to evaluate how different canopy structural attributes relate to fPAR. Our survey included sites from the National Ecological Observation Network and university field stations. Measures of CSC were more strongly coupled with fPAR under high light (>1,000 mu mol m(-2) s(-1) PAR). Under low light conditions, when diffuse light predominates, light scattering weakens the dependency of fPAR on CSC. A multivariate model including CSC parameters and VAI explains similar to 89% of the intersite variance in fPAR, an improvement of over a VAI only linear model (r(2) = 0.73). The inclusion of CSC metrics in canopy light absorption models could increase confidence in predictions of biogeochemical cycles and energy balance. Plain Language Summary Our work shows that it is not only how many leaves there are in a forest that determines how much light the forest can absorb, but also how those leaves are arranged. More complex forests are able to more thoroughly absorb light.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available