4.6 Article

Statistical Downscaling of GRACE-Derived Groundwater Storage Using ET Data in the North China Plain

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 123, Issue 11, Pages 5973-5987

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2017JD027468

Keywords

statistical downscaling method; GRACE; ET; GWS; the Beijing Plain

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [41572220]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [J150002]
  3. University of Newcastle
  4. Chinese Scholarship Council
  5. NASA MEaSUREs Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to coarse spatial resolution, the application of Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data in local groundwater resource management has been limited. To overcome this issue, a downscaling approach is presented to improve the spatial resolution of GRACE-derived groundwater storage anomalies using evapotranspiration (ET) data. The statistical downscaling method is only applied in areas where there is a strong relationship between GRACE-derived groundwater storage (GWS) and ET, and the relationship can be established under different spatial resolutions. In this study, GWS anomalies are downscaled from 110 km to 2 km in the North China Plain, capturing subgrid heterogeneity in groundwater storage changes. The downscaled results are further validated using data from 111 observation wells from 2003 to 2014 in the Beijing Plain. The results show that the in situ groundwater levels agree with the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) downscaled results for the Beijing Plain in both interannual and monthly scales, with the correlation coefficient of 0.94 and 0.80, respectively. The correlation coefficients vary from 0.63 to 0.78, in 10 of the 13 Beijing Plain administrative regions. The regional downscaling approach employed in this study may be readily integrated into local water resources planning activities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available